Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

5 Things to Look for When Evaluating a Contract Manufacturing Firm

By Doug Ringer, Product Development & Marketing Expert | December 7, 2015

Share

I have worked with multiple company-owned factories at General Electric, Ericsson, Honeywell, and with contract manufacturers. These are the criterion I use when involved in the selection process of a contract manufacturer (CM).

The criterion are:

  1. Demonstrable expertise and success building similar products in the appropriate volume
  2. Numerous positive references and testimonials
  3. Advertised expertise
  4. A quality control and product audit function
  5. Terms and conditions

First, demonstrable expertise and success building similar products in the appropriate volume, seems obvious. Too many organizations select a CM based mainly on the piece-part cost. A contract manufacturing firm with good sales and marketing can convince an unsuspecting prospect that they are capable by showing expertise that appears to apply to the project at hand. 

The problem, aside from possible deceptive practices of the sales & marketing team, is the technology used today is extremely complex. This complexity makes it important for a client to choose a manufacturer who has successfully built similar products.

To accomplish this, it is critical that production capabilities and current products being built by the potential CM are reviewed in detail. Hire an independent expert to evaluate the competence of the firm if you do not have the technical ability to make this evaluation. It will cost relatively little for the evaluation and the benefit of risk reduction will far outweigh the cost.

Second, multiple, positive references and testimonials. This is a simple request and if they refuse to provide references and testimonials under a non-disclosure agreement, then walk away.

Contract firms and consultants gain new business through referrals. If they will not provide names of satisfied clients, they either do not have any, or the technology you require is different than any of their previous work.

Third, expertise in your technical field. Does the manufacturer have the test engineering and technical/troubleshooting capabilities to solve, or at least assist in solving, problems that arise during early production and volume production? These two stages of production are very different and require different skills.

If they do not have engineers and technicians on staff, is there a relationship in place with a nearby technical firm that can supply these services in a timely manner?

Fourth, a quality control and audit functions. How does your factory ensure you receive a quality product that meets requirements? They probably have a quality assurance (QA) department responsible for quality control. An ISO9000 certified factory has work procedures they must follow. During your interviews and meetings, demand to see their work processes and system for collecting and analyzing production data.

Lastly, a brief look at the business and financial arrangements? If your prospective factory made through the first four of these steps they are likely technically qualified and honest enough to share their documents, quality control, and some of their clients.

The final item to consider is the terms and conditions under which you will conduct business. The business requirements are important and can mean the difference between a successful product line and a failure.

However, the difference in cost between the acceptable top and bottom firms will probably be less than 15% and the top firms will perform at a higher level on all of the first four steps. A slightly lower margin can be compensated for by fewer returns for poor quality and in more preferable payment terms.

You can make up for a slightly lower gross margin but revenue lost due to schedule and shipping delays and excess returns are lost forever. 

We cannot view all contract manufacturers as the same. Each have their own expertise and methods of doing business. Find the firms that have proven records of success in your field of need. Then eliminate any of them who cannot prove this expertise and back-up the proof with some form of guarantee.

The hard work and diligence required by this vetting process will be returned many times over. Failure to do the work can cause irreparable damage to your business at worst and a difficult industrialization process at best.


Filed Under: Industrial automation

 

Related Articles Read More >

Festo and the power of worker upskilling at the Oracle Industry Lab
Five ways to drive ROI from personnel and cobot investments
Safety Air Guns use engineered air nozzles for high performance
EXAIR’s new no drip siphon fed spray nozzle coats, cools and cleans

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Global supply needs drive increased manufacturing footprint development
  • How to Increase Rotational Capacity for a Retaining Ring
  • Cordis high resolution electronic proportional pressure controls
  • WAGO’s custom designed interface wiring system making industrial applications easier
  • 10 Reasons to Specify Valve Manifolds
  • Case study: How a 3D-printed tool saved thousands of hours and dollars

Design World Podcasts

May 17, 2022
Another view on additive and the aerospace industry
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings