Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

Analyst: Spectrum License Fees Would Hit Small Carriers Hardest

By Diana Goovaerts | February 10, 2016

Share

In the wake of President Obama’s recent budget proposal that calls for the implementation of a new “spectrum license user fee,” one analyst is warning that such a levy on the industry would disproportionately impact small carriers.

Recon Analytics’ Roger Entner on Tuesday called the proposed fees a “tax hike” and said the extra costs would make it harder for up and coming carriers to compete with their larger tier-1 rivals.

“Such a tax hike will make it more difficult for new entrants to a very competitive market as it raises their cost to provide service,” Entner said. “If you’re a startup, how much can you pass through? For most new entrants, the way to make an entrance is to beat the big guys. So it will hurt the little guys.”

Entner said the effects of the spectrum fees would be felt by rural carriers in particular, who have fewer customers but lots of spectrum. The result, he said, would be a large cost spread over a small base.

Eventually, though, Entner said the costs would likely trickle down to come out of the pockets of consumers and businesses using increasingly ubiquitous wireless services.

“It’s basically a tax hike – even if you call it spectrum license fee – on a service that is essential for consumers and businesses alike,” Entner said. “Ultimately all these taxes are paid by the American people. For an industry with about $190 billion in service revenues, a $4.8 billion tax hike represents an additional burden of 2.5 percent for wireless customers.”

“We’re going to pay for it,” he continued. “They’re going to pass it through or it’s going to come out of the pocket of shareholders, which means the value of the stock goes down. Americans will pay for it one way or another. My money, though, is that it will get handed through to consumers.”

Shortly after the Administration’s budget release, CTIA also raised concerns that the proposed fees would have a negative impact on revenues from the upcoming spectrum auction. Sue Rudd, Director of Service Provider Analysis at Strategy Analytics, seconded that sentiment on Tuesday.

“If the Federal Government is layering user fees on top of the initial auction fees operators are likely to look at the life-cycle cost of both and adjust their auction bids accordingly,” Rudd said. “So in the long run the total government revenue from spectrum may not increase significantly.”

Prior to the new fee proposal, Bloomberg reported that auction revenues were already projected to fall well short of the $45 billion expected by the FCC, possibly amounting to just $33 million.


Filed Under: Telecommunications (Spectrum)

 

Related Articles Read More >

HH-Hood-Latch_Image
Southco’s ultra-thin hood latch for limited-space applications
Flying Focus: Controlling Lasers Through Time and Space
AT&T Scoops Up More Spectrum in Mexico at 2.5 GHz Auction
Tuesdays with Roger: New Millimeter Wave Spectrum Auctions

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Renishaw next-generation FORTiS™ enclosed linear encoders offer enhanced metrology and reliability for machine tools
  • WAGO’s smartDESIGNER Online Provides Seamless Progression for Projects
  • Epoxy Certified for UL 1203 Standard
  • The Importance of Industrial Cable Resistance to Chemicals and Oils
  • Optimize, streamline and increase production capacity with pallet-handling conveyor systems
  • Global supply needs drive increased manufacturing footprint development

Design World Podcasts

June 12, 2022
How to avoid over engineering a part
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings