Design World

  • Home
  • Articles
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
  • 3D CAD Models
    • PARTsolutions
    • TraceParts
  • Leadership
    • 2020 Winners
    • 2019 Winners
    • 2020 LEAP Awards
  • Resources
    • DIGITAL ISSUES
      • EE World Digital Issues
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • 2020 LEAP Awards
    • MC² Motion Control Classroom
    • Motion Design Guide Library
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
  • Women in Engineering
  • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • COVID-19

Driverless Car runs afoul of the Law

By Steve Meyer | January 8, 2017

Share

Among the many rights that are reserved to the States of the United States is the right to license motor vehicles for operation on public roadways.  Last week these rights came into conflict with Uber’s driverless vehicle testing program in San Francisco.  In particular there are safety concerns for the citizenry of any state where driverless cars are being tested.  Since “We the People” have agreed through legislative process that the safety of citizens on city and state streets is the responsibility of the State government, there needs to be some interaction between Uber and the State of California Department of Motor Vehicles and the City of San Francisco.

How this applies to driverless cars is, indeed, the crux of the problem.  One would assume that in order for any motor vehicle to operate on the streets of San Francisco a vehicle license would be required.  Consistent with that, there are 20 companies operating driverless vehicle test programs.  Uber simply isn’t one of them.  To make matters worse, Uber refuses to comply with what might be viewed as minimum requirements for any motor vehicle to operate on public roads.

The State of California is charged with the safety of citizens on public roads.  Uber’s refusal to license the cars with the State seems a foolish gesture especially when the trials weren’t going very well making concerns about safety a real problem.

This might not be such a big deal, except for the fact that there have been between 2 and 5 cases of the Uber vehicles running red lights.  Demonstrating with absolute certainty that the driverless vehicles are not any better today than human drivers.  Which is supposed to be the point.

Development of the technology has spanned decades and it does not appear ready for wide deployment YET.  That day may come, but it will require that advocates (car companies) can show that the software and control systems are able to operate more safely than human drivers.  The goal is to reduce traffic accidents and loss of human life.

Which leads to the second problem; the other States right which bears directly on the technology is the licensing of drivers of motor vehicles.  How are the states going to license the software and control systems of driverless cars?  Obviously, only when vehicle manufacturers can demonstrate the safety of the product.  Which in this case is no small feat.

Are controllers, or control systems, or control system software, or servers, or what exactly are we going to license to operate a motor vehicle?

 

Mechatronic Tips

MOTION DESIGN GUIDES

“motion

“motion

“motion

“motion

“motion

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Configuration Management: Configuration Integrity IS A Core Driver for Business Success
  • How to Choose a Linear Actuator
  • Create your perfect machine with Advanced Engineering
  • How a ME/EE turned passion for design into his own bike company
  • Everyone Can Save on Cable Costs. Here’s How
  • How and Why You Should Use a Wave Spring for Bearing Preload
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Tweets by @DesignWorld
Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP Awards

Copyright © 2021 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Articles
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
  • 3D CAD Models
    • PARTsolutions
    • TraceParts
  • Leadership
    • 2020 Winners
    • 2019 Winners
    • 2020 LEAP Awards
  • Resources
    • DIGITAL ISSUES
      • EE World Digital Issues
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • 2020 LEAP Awards
    • MC² Motion Control Classroom
    • Motion Design Guide Library
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
  • Women in Engineering
  • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • COVID-19
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.OkNoRead more