Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

Hack the crisis: That was fast! FDA begins approving modified bag resuscitators for use as ventilators

By Lee Teschler | April 17, 2020

Share

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has begun approving for use during the COVID-19 pandemic bag resuscitators that have been converted to respiratory ventilators.

Late in March, the FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that cleared the way for such modifications by eliminating a mandate that manufacturing facilities follow current good manufacturing practices (CGMP), including quality system requirements, when making ventilators under the EUA. Suspending the CGMP practices, which typically involve a significant amount of procedure documentation and record keeping, allowed non-medical manufacturers such as Ford and GM to begin ventilator production. The EUA also allowed commercially available bag resuscitators and other devices to be modified in a way that allows them to fill in as ventilators.

The first of these converted bag resuscitators have now been approved by the FDA. Among those designs getting the agency’s blessing is one developed by the University of Minnesota and produced by Boston Scientific and a second device developed and manufactured by Dan T. Moore Co. in Cleveland, Ohio.

The speed and means by which these devices were developed and approved is noteworthy. Medical devices must meet literally dozens of electrical and safety standards before their commercial introduction. The EUA for ventilators, for example, lists more than 22 IEEE and IEC standards that modified devices must adhere to. The usual means of demonstrating compliance with these technical standards is through testing by independent labs such as UL, CSA, or TÜV SÜD. But it looks as though the devices approved under the ventilator EUA won’t need to be tested by independent labs.

secondbreath

Views of the electric pneumatic resuscitator devised by SecondBreath, so named because it uses a pneumatic cylinder powered from hospital compressed air to depress the bag. It is clear from a comparison with an ordinary bag resuscitator that the process of converting these devices to respirators involves more than just adding a mechanical arm. The SecondBreath device, for example, includes alarms, controls, and regulators not found on bag resuscitators, all needed to meet ARDS Net compliance. Click image to enlarge.

Officials involved with obtaining FDA approval of the Cleveland-based effort, called SecondBreath, describe a process where device developers ran their own tests, then sent the result to the FDA for review. SecondBreath spokesman Windsor Ford says the firm’s interactions with the FDA were mainly through email. No FDA personnel inspected the manufacturing facility which consists of unused space in a Dan T. Moore warehouse. And no FDA personnel supervised testing. Nevertheless, there was “an enormous amount of testing” involved in proving the modified resuscitators complied with FDA requirements, says Ford. Some of this testing took place on a breathing simulator called an ASL 5000 which can “breath” while hooked up to a ventilator. The SecondBreath device also had to go through ARDS Net (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) compliance testing which took place in cooperation with local hospitals. “We provided the FDA with extensive video and other documentation of our tests that made them comfortable that we had performed all the tests correctly,” says Ford.

One factor that simplified the FDA approval process somewhat was that almost all the components on the SecondBreath machine had UL approval for medical use. “If you have a component that doesn’t have that approval, you just have to be 100% transparent about it. The main part on our device that didn’t have that UL approval was the metal enclosure we machined ourselves,” said Ford.

Also helpful for the ventilator effort was the fact that most of the Dan T. Moore production facilities meet ISO 9000 quality management standards. “That gives us a leg up over the guy who is trying to do this in a garage,” said Ford.

It was two engineers working for Dan T. Moore Co. auto parts manufacturers who came up with the initial design. SecondBreath has already produced 30 of the devices – technically called electric pneumatic resuscitators. The company will soon be able to make between 100 and 200 daily, depending on customer demand, said Ford.

But the path to that production has been surprisingly smooth. “The FDA was amazingly helpful throughout the whole application process,” said Ford.

You may also like:


  • DIY ventilators? Not unless there’s a zombie apocalypse.
  • silicon valley the new cleveland
    Will Silicon Valley go the way of Cleveland?

  • How to torment your colleagues with statistics

  • When smart people make dumb decisions

Filed Under: Hack the Crisis: Engineering through COVID-19, Medical
Tagged With: #covidengineering
 

Related Articles Read More >

Kawasaki Robotic PPE manufacturing cell allows harbor technologies to expand globally amidst shortage
Biden Administration to issue employer vaccination mandate
igus introduces 168 new motion plastics innovations
Hartland Chamber of Commerce names Dorner 2020 Manufacturer of the Year, citing COVID-19 efforts

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Pushing performance: Adding functionality to terminal blocks
  • Get to Know Würth Industrial Division
  • Renishaw next-generation FORTiS™ enclosed linear encoders offer enhanced metrology and reliability for machine tools
  • WAGO’s smartDESIGNER Online Provides Seamless Progression for Projects
  • Epoxy Certified for UL 1203 Standard
  • The Importance of Industrial Cable Resistance to Chemicals and Oils

Design World Podcasts

June 12, 2022
How to avoid over engineering a part
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings