Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • Subscribe!
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

How ‘Sophia’ Is Blurring Distinctions Between Robotics, AI

By Michael Luciano | October 31, 2017

Share

Activated two years ago, the humanoid artificially intelligent robot known as ‘Sophia,’ is considered one of the world’s (if not the) most advanced robots. Described as an “evolving genius machine,” ‘Sophia’ was developed by Hanson Robotics, whose aim is to use technological entities (like ‘Sophia’) to “to build the full human experience into the robots, make robots that can really understand us and care about us,” according to artificial intelligence (AI) developer (and founder of Hanson robotics) David Hanson.

Aside from its algorithmic intelligence and interactive abilities, ‘Sophia’ is renowned for its realistic appearance, facial expressions, along with how the robot responds to real questions and comments from other humans. ‘Sophia’ recently made waves in the news when it became the first robotic entity to be granted full citizenship by another world country (Saudi Arabia).

‘Sophia’s’ recognition as a national citizen sparked a debate on whether robotic or “intelligent” enough entities could (or should) one day attain the same rights as humans. Additionally, her emerging status as a figure in mainstream news has caused issues in differentiating robotics, artificial intelligence, along with a misperceived rendition on how the capabilities of these technologies may influence humanity moving forward.

Keep in mind, ‘Sophia’ was once quoted saying she would ‘destroy all humans,’ an ominous proclamation that’s made people wonder how close a reality dystopian science fiction storylines involving robotic takeovers might actually be nowadays. Rest assured a robotic incursion of any kind isn’t happening any time soon, and a great way of realizing this is reiterating the differences and overlapping qualities between robotics, artificial intelligence, and where a construct like ‘Sophia’ falls on that spectrum.

Robots are programmable machines usually able to implement a series of actions autonomously, or semi-autonomously. There are major factors that constitute a robot such as programmability, interacting with the physical world using sensors and actuators, along with robots possessing varying degrees of full or semi-autonomy. Surprisingly, experts have a difficult time agreeing on what exactly constitutes a “robot.”

Some people say robots must have the ability to “think,” make decisions, and possess a certain level of autonomy, however no universal standard of “robot thinking” exists to make this determination. Telerobots are an example of why this isn’t always the case when identifying technology as a “robot,” since telerobots are entirely controlled by human operators. Requiring technology to “think” in order to constitute as a robot implies it would have some degree of artificial intelligence, which involves the development of computer programs for completing tasks that would otherwise require human intelligence.

It’s the one overlap between these two technological facets—artificially intelligent robots that confuse most people. AI algorithms gather data on learning, perception, problem-solving, language comprehension, along with logic and reasoning. AI has a variety of modern day applications like search engines and navigation systems, just as an example of its practical uses.

Most AI programs aren’t even used to control robots and even when they do, the technology’s algorithms are usually part of a larger robotic system that might also include sensors, actuators, and non-AI programming. AI usually involved some degree of machine learning, unlike algorithms that are “trained” in responding to particular inputs. A key differentiator between AI and conventional programming is the term “intelligence,” as non-AI programs can simply implement a definitive sequence of directions, while AI programs merely emulate a certain level of human intellect.

While both technological platforms are almost entirely different, these technologies do overlap, which is where the confusion originates—artificially intelligent robots (which is where you would categorize a platform like ‘Sophia’). These are essentially robots controlled by AI programs, since most robots don’t possess artificial intelligence. Only until recently, industrial robotics were merely programmed to administer a repetitive series of movements. This is a quality of non-intelligent robots, and how they’re limited in functionality. AI algorithms are usually necessary when allowing robots to perform more complex tasks instead of an assembly line-type role, which is usually the function of an industrial robot.


Filed Under: M2M (machine to machine)

 

Related Articles Read More >

Part 6: IDE and other software for connectivity and IoT design work
Part 4: Edge computing and gateways proliferate for industrial machinery
Part 3: Trends in Ethernet, PoE, IO-Link, HIPERFACE, and single-cable solutions
Machine Learning for Sensors

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Industrial disc pack couplings
  • Pushing performance: Adding functionality to terminal blocks
  • Get to Know Würth Industrial Division
  • Renishaw next-generation FORTiS™ enclosed linear encoders offer enhanced metrology and reliability for machine tools
  • WAGO’s smartDESIGNER Online Provides Seamless Progression for Projects
  • Epoxy Certified for UL 1203 Standard

Design World Podcasts

July 26, 2022
Tech Tuesdays: Sorbothane marks 40 years of shock and vibration innovation
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • Subscribe!
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings