Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • ELECTRONICS • ELECTRICAL
    • Fastening • joining
    • FLUID POWER
    • LINEAR MOTION
    • MOTION CONTROL
    • SENSORS
    • TEST & MEASUREMENT
    • Factory automation
    • Warehouse automation
    • DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
  • Learn
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Learning center
    • eBooks • Tech Tips
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars • general engineering
    • Webinars • Automated warehousing
    • Voices
  • LEAP Awards
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guides
  • Resources
    • Subscribe
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Engineering diversity
    • Trends
  • Supplier Listings
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

The intelligence of the Metric System

By Paul Heney | March 20, 2014

Guest blog by Randy Bancroft, P.E.

metricIgnorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.
— Charles Darwin

I began working as a consulting engineer in 2007. From the outset, I wanted to work exclusively in metric. It’s been quite an education, and the first lesson has been that U.S. engineers have no idea how to use the metric system. Something like the Dunning-Kruger Effect seems to be operating.

Examples of measurement folly are legion. Given engineering drawings in inches, I generally find awkward dimensions with several decimal places. Converting these to millimeters, I discover simple whole numbers. Designs originally in metric, almost always from other countries, are converted to non-metric, at some expense. Why? This happens even when manufacturing is to be done overseas.

U.S. aerospace companies prefer an inch-based, colloquial unit called a mil, over micrometers and millimeters. One reason: NASA demands it, in spite of official commitments to align its engineering with the space agencies of other countries.

I’ve designed GPS antennas for which the conversion from metric to Ye Olde English measures nearly ended in creating a considerable amount of expensive scrap. The length of the GPS antenna resonator was converted from metric to Olde English, with a numerical transposition. This was caught just before fabrication.

Electronic components are in metric dimensions to conform with international standards, but U.S. designers force them onto incompatible mil (inch-based) grids, necessitating hand-routing of printed circuit boards. Despite international agreements, redundant, inch-based size designations for surface-mount electronic components were created at the demand of U.S. industry, with some designations identical to metric, causing world-wide confusion.

U.S. fastener sizes are a mixture of awkward fractions of inches—and meaningless “gauge” numbers, without rational or logical correlation. In contrast, the metric screw designation M5 instantly tells you it is 5 mm in diameter, and that a five millimeter drill bit will produce a friction fit. Quick! What drill bit will produce a friction fit for a 4-40 screw? I’ve yet to meet a machinist who could answer this question. What is the size? There isn’t one. With the metric system, an average high school student could answer the question. When an Australian Ford plant implemented metric threads in 1972, they cut bolt-sizes stocked by 88%  and nuts by 72%.

Related: Why we won’t kill the Imperial System

Australia’s rational mandatory metric implementation produced savings throughout their industries. When I tell fellow engineers that the Australian construction industry uses millimeters only, it elicits guffaws. “That’s ridiculous! The unit is too small to build houses with!” American ignorance begets confidence. In fact, the use of millimeters (centimeters are banned) means that all dimensions on a construction site become whole numbers, from rough concrete forms to kitchen cabinetry. Eliminating decimals eliminates a great deal of scrap from mis-cut materials. This has saved Australia 10-15% in construction costs since the 1970s, compared with the U.S.

Because two sets of measurement units exist in the U.S., OEMs, and individuals, needlessly maintain two sets of tools, Ye Olde English and metric. In the U.S., there is instantly a discussion of the costs of going metric-only, but never how much cost is involved in maintaining a 15th-century set of irrational measurement units for design. We in the U.S. have 14 definitions of gauge: wire gauge, drill bit gauge and sheet metal gauge are but a few. I’ve seen situations where a fixture needed equally thick polycarbonate plastic and metal sheet. If they were both manufactured and called out in millimeters, this would be a trivial exercise.

I’ve seen adhesives fail in the U.S. because they were cured at 100° F instead of 100° C. The non-U.S. manufacturer documentation just said 100°, unambiguous everywhere but here. Which set of tools should be used for production equipment repair is often unknown, as many offerings have both Olde English and metric in the same design. For start-up companies, time is everything. Product development is often confined to the most commonly available parts and materials. In US hardware stores you will not find metric drill bits, or nylon metric screws, or millimeter-only scales or tape measures. To save time, one has the choice of using what is in the hardware store, or purchasing online.

In the U.S., we see ourselves as world class designers, but what is more fundamental to design than a measurement system and its effective use? An examination of how best to use basic measurement units seems to be beneath the attention of U.S. engineers and designers. Because of this, they remain certain that the metric system is something to be addressed in the future. For the other 95%  of the world’s population, the future is now.

Randy Bancroft is an engineer and author. He blogs as The Metric Maven at themetricmaven.com.

Related: Editors On Topic: Metric Vs Imperial

Pneumatic Tips

You Might Also Like


Filed Under: Hydraulic equipment + components, Pneumatic equipment + components, Student programs • Technical education

 

About The Author

Paul Heney

Paul J. Heney, the VP, Editorial Director for Design World magazine, has a BS in Engineering Science & Mechanics and minors in Technical Communications and Biomedical Engineering from Georgia Tech. He has written about fluid power, aerospace, robotics, medical, green engineering, and general manufacturing topics for more than 25 years. He has won numerous regional and national awards for his writing from the American Society of Business Publication Editors.

LEARNING CENTER

Design World Learning Center
“dw
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Design Engineering Professionals.
Motor University

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Sustainability, Innovation and Safety, Central to Our Approach
  • Why off-highway is the sweet spot for AC electrification technology
  • Looking to 2025: Past Success Guides Future Achievements
  • North American Companies Seek Stronger Ties with Italian OEMs
  • Adapt and Evolve
  • Sustainable Practices for a Sustainable World
View More >>
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Control Engineering
  • Consulting-Specifying Engineer
  • Plant Engineering
  • Engineering White Papers
  • Leap Awards

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • ELECTRONICS • ELECTRICAL
    • Fastening • joining
    • FLUID POWER
    • LINEAR MOTION
    • MOTION CONTROL
    • SENSORS
    • TEST & MEASUREMENT
    • Factory automation
    • Warehouse automation
    • DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
  • Learn
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Learning center
    • eBooks • Tech Tips
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars • general engineering
    • Webinars • Automated warehousing
    • Voices
  • LEAP Awards
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guides
  • Resources
    • Subscribe
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Engineering diversity
    • Trends
  • Supplier Listings
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. We share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners who may combine it with other information you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.OkNoRead more