Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

NASA Test Flights Examine Effect of Atmospheric Turbulence on Sonic Booms

By NASA | August 26, 2016

Share

NASA has concluded a series of flights designed to study the way sonic booms travel through the atmosphere.

The Sonic Booms in Atmospheric Turbulence, or SonicBAT, flights were performed at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California, in late July, to help NASA researchers measure the effect of low-altitude turbulence on sonic booms reaching the ground. This will help engineers further the study of shockwaves, and will assist in the development of tools necessary to further the development of future supersonic commercial aircraft.

The goal of the flights was to collect sonic boom signature data during turbulent atmospheric conditions in a hot and dry climate, in order to develop models for the effects of turbulence on sonic booms, according to the project’s principal investigator, Ed Haering.

“SonicBAT is the first modern flight effort to purposely measure sonic booms in atmospheric turbulence,” said Haering. “The SonicBAT effort will develop two different models for the effects of turbulence on supersonic aircraft noise, and is one aspect of the total effort to make supersonic aircraft quieter.”

In total, 69 sonic booms were produced over a two week period, in which NASA pilots flew an F/A-18 at a speed of Mach 1.38 to create the shockwaves, which were measured by several elements both on the ground and in the air.

 “Statistically you need more than just a few sonic boom recordings, you really need to capture data in varying weather conditions across a large array to conduct a full analysis on how sonic booms are affected by turbulence,” said Brett Pauer, SonicBAT project manager. ”We need to be able to incorporate any loudness changes due to turbulence into future supersonic aircraft designs.”

Three microphone arrays, provided by NASA, Wyle Laboratories, The Boeing Company and Gulfstream Aerospace, were arranged strategically on the ground at Edwards Air Force Base to measure and collect the sonic boom signatures. A primary array, consisting of 16 microphones spread over a 1,500 foot span, was used along with a secondary array of eight microphones 100 feet apart, 1.42 miles away. A third array, arranged in the same linear structure as the secondary array, was set up 2.78 miles away from the primary.

The principal objective of these ground arrays was to measure the levels of sound waves from the sonic booms produced by the F/A-18, after they had gone through the atmospheric turbulence layer.

In order to compare this to data of the same sound waves without the element of atmospheric turbulence, NASA equipped a TG-14 motor glider with instrumentation to collect sonic boom signatures above that turbulent layer.

Fitted with a specially-configured audio instrumentation package and a wing-mounted microphone boom, the TG-14 flew patterns anywhere from 2,200 feet to 10,000 feet above the ground. These altitudes were dependent on the time of day of the passes, and the corresponding height of the turbulence layer. The F/A-18, meanwhile, was flying within the supersonic corridor, at 32,000 feet, to produce the sonic booms.

The same shockwave recorded by the TG-14 will be compared to that of the ground arrays, giving researchers a better idea of how atmospheric turbulence may influence sonic booms, according to Pauer.

“The atmospheric conditions of summer at Edwards Air Force Base made it the ideal location for this manner of testing, as the turbulence layer is influenced by the dry, rising heat during the day,” Pauer said. “That heat rises unevenly, creating thermal turbulence near the ground, causing the turbulence layer to climb.”

In addition to the hot, dry climate of Edwards, the team is proposing to look into the same approach of testing in a damper environment. Potential locations for testing in a more humid region include NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The higher humidity will make the sonic booms louder, and that data gathered will be compared to data collected from the flights over Edwards.

SonicBAT is one of the many research efforts of the Commercial Supersonic Technology project, which is an element of NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate.


Filed Under: Aerospace + defense

 

Related Articles Read More >

Ontic acquires Servotek and Westcon product lines from Marsh Bellofram
Flexible rotary shafts support thrust reverser on 150 LEAP 1-A turbofan engines
Drone-mounted inspection breaks barriers for F-35
TriStar, a misunderstood failure of design

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Global supply needs drive increased manufacturing footprint development
  • How to Increase Rotational Capacity for a Retaining Ring
  • Cordis high resolution electronic proportional pressure controls
  • WAGO’s custom designed interface wiring system making industrial applications easier
  • 10 Reasons to Specify Valve Manifolds
  • Case study: How a 3D-printed tool saved thousands of hours and dollars

Design World Podcasts

May 17, 2022
Another view on additive and the aerospace industry
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings