Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • ELECTRONICS • ELECTRICAL
    • Fastening • joining
    • FLUID POWER
    • LINEAR MOTION
    • MOTION CONTROL
    • SENSORS
    • TEST & MEASUREMENT
    • Factory automation
    • Warehouse automation
    • DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
  • Learn
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Learning center
    • eBooks • Tech Tips
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars • general engineering
    • Webinars • Automated warehousing
    • Voices
  • LEAP Awards
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guides
  • Resources
    • Subscribe
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Engineering diversity
    • Trends
  • Supplier Listings
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Op-ed: Restoring a Uniform Approach to Internet Freedom

By Anna-Maria Kovacs, Ph.D., CFA, Visiting Senior Policy Scholar at the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy | December 8, 2017

At its December 14 open meeting, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is expected to vote the Restoring Internet Freedom (RIF) order.  This order will bring uniformity to the protection of American consumers throughout the Internet, aligning the rules for broadband Internet access providers (access providers) with those for edge providers as well as ensuring consistency across all fifty states.   

The order will reverse the 2015 classification of broadband Internet access as a Title II common-carrier service called a “telecommunications service.”  Common-carrier regulation dates back to the Communications Act of 1934, and was designed for monopoly voice telephony, at a time when the Internet did not exist.

The Internet’s first incarnation was the connection of four computers by dial-up 64-kilobit lines in 1969.  The impetus to the Internet’s growth was the popularization of the World Wide Web, which began in 1993.  The Telecom Act of 1996’s update of the Communications Act of 1934 did not deal with the Internet extensively, but it did recognize that there were new services that were data-driven and it included under Title I a new classification called an “information service.”   At the same time, it retained the common-carrier “telecommunications service” designation under Title II.

In other words, with regard to the Internet, the FCC has two statutory options.   Using Title II, as the Wheeler FCC chose to do in 2015, opens the door to profound micromanagement designed for a monopoly, voice-only network whose sole function was transmission and whose switching was designed around central offices that easily separated intrastate from interstate calls. 

Using Title I, as the Pai FCC is poised to do in 2017, allows for the much lighter touch that was applied before the 2015 order and at the same time restores jurisdiction to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The FTC has continuously regulated Internet edge-providers from the perspectives of consumer-protection as well as antitrust, i.e. competitor-protection, and only lost that jurisdiction over the access providers because of the 2015 order. 

Applying Title II to the Internet makes as much sense as regulating space travel under traffic rules designed for the Model T, under the argument that both are forms of transportation. Worse, it has resulted in reduced investment in Internet-access infrastructure.  Applying Title I is an elegant solution that ensures uniform consumer protection for all Americans who use the Internet. 

The 2017 order, for the most part, eliminates the artificial and increasingly irrelevant distinctions that the 2015 order made between “edge” and “access” providers of Internet services.   The 2017 order ensures, for example, that when a consumer initiates an inquiry to a search engine or sends an email or posts on social media, all the parties involved in relaying and responding to that activity, regardless of the parties’ location within the U.S., are subject to the FTC’s consumer-protection and the FTC’s and DOJ’s antitrust authority.   

At the same time, the 2017 order provides for scrutiny and discipline by the FTC of access providers regarding key Internet-freedom behaviors.  The order requires them to be transparent about specific network-management behaviors, including blocking and throttling.  The major access providers have committed to avoid blocking and throttling.  Having made those public commitments, access providers could be prosecuted by the FTC for violations once its jurisdiction is restored.   

The FCC’s Restoring Internet Freedom order restores a light-touch, uniform regulatory approach to consumer protection on the Internet.  It will also reinvigorate investment in this sector, which underpins much of the U.S. economy.  It is a welcome return to Internet Freedom.   

Anna-Maria Kovacs, Ph.D., CFA, is a Visiting Senior Policy Scholar at the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy. She has covered the communications industry for more than three decades as a financial analyst and consultant. 

You Might Also Like


Filed Under: Industry regulations + certifications

 

LEARNING CENTER

Design World Learning Center
“dw
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Design Engineering Professionals.
Motor University

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Sustainability, Innovation and Safety, Central to Our Approach
  • Why off-highway is the sweet spot for AC electrification technology
  • Looking to 2025: Past Success Guides Future Achievements
  • North American Companies Seek Stronger Ties with Italian OEMs
  • Adapt and Evolve
  • Sustainable Practices for a Sustainable World
View More >>
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Control Engineering
  • Consulting-Specifying Engineer
  • Plant Engineering
  • Engineering White Papers
  • Leap Awards

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • ELECTRONICS • ELECTRICAL
    • Fastening • joining
    • FLUID POWER
    • LINEAR MOTION
    • MOTION CONTROL
    • SENSORS
    • TEST & MEASUREMENT
    • Factory automation
    • Warehouse automation
    • DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
  • Learn
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Learning center
    • eBooks • Tech Tips
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars • general engineering
    • Webinars • Automated warehousing
    • Voices
  • LEAP Awards
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guides
  • Resources
    • Subscribe
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Engineering diversity
    • Trends
  • Supplier Listings
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. We share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners who may combine it with other information you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.OkNoRead more