Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

Public Advocates Balk at CTIA Proposal to Change CBRS License Framework

By Diana Goovaerts | June 19, 2017

Share

The FCC is once again in the middle of a tug-of-war between industry and advocacy groups, this time battling over licensing rules for Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) spectrum.

A coalition of 14 non-profit advocacy groups on Monday urged the FCC to reject a request from wireless industry association CTIA to reshape the CBRS license framework, calling the proposal an “effort to backtrack on this unique achievement in forward-thinking spectrum policy.”

The current CBRS rules include small area, short-term licensing (known as Priority Access Licenses) as well as band-wide opportunistic access, open to anyone (dubbed General Authorized Access). But in a filing submitted on Friday, CTIA asked the Commission to launch a rulemaking proceeding to “make common sense changes to the Priority Access License framework.” Specifically, CTIA wants the Commission to change the priority license term from three years to ten, modify the license areas to consist of traditional Partial Economic Areas rather than census tracts, and alter the requirements for Spectrum Access System Administrators’ treatment of Citizens Broadband Radio Service Device registration information to reduce security risks to user identity information and to protect sensitive deployment information from disclosure to competitors.

CTIA argued the requested changes are designed specifically to incentivize investment in the 3.5 GHz band, and said swift action wouldn’t hinder deployments. The association also said 3.5 GHz is increasingly viewed as a prime band for 5G deployments around the world. The United States should provide investment certainty in the band with longer license terms if it wants to stay at the forefront of next generation deployments, CTIA added.

But advocacy groups including New America’s Open Technology Institute, Next Century Cities, Center for Rural Strategies, the American Library Association, the Schools, Health and Libraries Broadband Coalition, and Public Knowledge asserted the opposite is true.

“Consumer advocates and public sector institutions, including signatories to this letter, are convinced that the more open, flexible, and localized approach to dynamic spectrum sharing represented by CBRS will be a boon to consumer welfare, rural broadband access, and to schools, libraries and many other venues that can deploy and customize their own private LTE networks,” the groups wrote in a letter to the FCC. “We believe that auctioning licenses with coverage areas larger than census tracts would undermine the purpose of this small cell innovation band. A traditional licensing scheme based on exclusive access to very large geographic areas for inherently small cell deployments would not allow the largest possible number of businesses, individuals, nonprofit institutions, and other entities the ability to self-provision capacity for mobile data offload, for neutral host LTE networks, or to customize highly-localized networks for machine-to-machine, smart city, and other connectivity needs.”

The groups pointed out the use of large license areas would be inefficient for indoor use cases, as well as small-cell, high-capacity use cases. Large licenses would also likely leave spectrum unused in low-density environments outside traffic centers, whereas the current model would allow open access for both operators and end users, the coalition said.

The coalition also said changing the rules now would introduce uncertainty and cast aside thousands of hours of standards development work done by companies in the Wireless Innovation Forum and CBRS Alliance.

“CTIA is once again trying to ensure that licenses are too large and too expensive for anyone but the big incumbent cellular carriers,” Michael Calabrese, director of the Wireless Future Project at New America’s Open Technology Institute, commented. “With consumers and so many other companies poised to benefit, it is deeply disappointing that the FCC might even consider such a fundamental change so obviously aimed at stifling wireless competition and innovation.”


Filed Under: Telecommunications (Spectrum)

 

Related Articles Read More >

HH-Hood-Latch_Image
Southco’s ultra-thin hood latch for limited-space applications
Flying Focus: Controlling Lasers Through Time and Space
AT&T Scoops Up More Spectrum in Mexico at 2.5 GHz Auction
Tuesdays with Roger: New Millimeter Wave Spectrum Auctions

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Global supply needs drive increased manufacturing footprint development
  • How to Increase Rotational Capacity for a Retaining Ring
  • Cordis high resolution electronic proportional pressure controls
  • WAGO’s custom designed interface wiring system making industrial applications easier
  • 10 Reasons to Specify Valve Manifolds
  • Case study: How a 3D-printed tool saved thousands of hours and dollars

Design World Podcasts

May 17, 2022
Another view on additive and the aerospace industry
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings