Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

Second Company Intentionally Vented Gas During Aliso Canyon Leak

By Katie Mohr | March 23, 2016

Share

Earlier this year, Southern California Gas Company was ordered to permanently seal an Aliso Canyon well near Los Angeles that spewed 107,000 tons of natural gas over 16 weeks — making it the biggest methane release in U.S. history.

Last week, regulators announced $75,000 in penalties against another energy company operating in the Aliso Canyon Oil Field for gas emissions. These charges, however, are for intentionally releasing climate-changing gases.

The California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources announced three civil penalties against Termo Co. — a Long Beach-based oil and gas company — including “unreasonable waste of gas, improper disposal of oil field waste and failure to maintain and monitor production facilities,” reports the Los Angeles Times. Each charge carries a fine of $25,000.

The gases were discovered with an infrared camera during a fly-over of SoCalGas’ leak by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and South Coast Air Quality Management District on Jan. 23.

The Porter Ranch neighborhood is at the foothills of the Aliso Canyon facility. (AP Photo)

“Someone clearly made an effort to conceal the pipe, because even though we knew from aerial readings where it was generally, our field staff had to search carefully before finding it behind a tree,” said Ken Harris, state oil and gas supervisor, in a news release.

When the inspectors returned to the site on Jan. 28, however, the pipe was dismantled.

Furthermore, the release states, “Once the pipeline was discovered, [the] Operator destroyed the evidence of its existence before division personnel could fully inspect it. The brazen nature of this violation shows that [the] Operator held little to no regard for the statues and regulations or, more importantly, public health and safety.”

A Termo employee countered that the gas was being vented because the company was unable to transport its gas to the SoCalGas storage facility, due to a suspension all natural gas injections. The suspension will continue until SoCalGas has all of its Aliso Canyon wells inspected.

Inspectors aren’t sure how long Termo was venting gas from this pipe, but “if it weren’t for the aerial surveillance, the illegal discharge could have continued indefinitely,” said Harris.

Do you think it’s fair to charge Termo Co. with improperly venting its natural gas? Comment below or tweet @KatieeMohr.


Filed Under: Infrastructure

 

Related Articles Read More >

Do Sensors Make Infrastructure Safer?
Crawling Robots and Flying Drones May Help Missouri’s Bridges
Viasat and Facebook Collaborate to Expand Internet Connectivity in Rural Mexico
Smartphone-Based System to Monitor America’s Crumbling Infrastructure

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Renishaw next-generation FORTiS™ enclosed linear encoders offer enhanced metrology and reliability for machine tools
  • WAGO’s smartDESIGNER Online Provides Seamless Progression for Projects
  • Epoxy Certified for UL 1203 Standard
  • The Importance of Industrial Cable Resistance to Chemicals and Oils
  • Optimize, streamline and increase production capacity with pallet-handling conveyor systems
  • Global supply needs drive increased manufacturing footprint development

Design World Podcasts

June 12, 2022
How to avoid over engineering a part
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings