Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

Today in Engineering History: Kelly Barnes Dam Gives Way

By Kaylie Duffy | November 6, 2015

Share

On this day in history, November 6, 1977, the Kelly Barnes Dam, located above the Toccoa Falls Bible College near Toccoa, Georgia, gave way, resulting in the deaths of 39 people.

Yesterday: Improved Road Engine Patented

The dam went through many stages of development, first as a rock crib dam and then with various stages as an earth dam. In 1899, the rock crib dam was completed to back up water which would be used to power a small hydroelectric plant situated near the foot of the Toccoa Falls. The plant, called the Old Toccoa Falls Power Plant produced 200 kW (0.2 MW) for the town of Toccoa.

A view looking upstream through the Kelly Barnes Dam breach. Image credit: Vernon B. Sauer, Public Domain, Wikipedia Commons

In about 1937, the Toccoa Falls Bible Institute became interested in developing a more reliable power source and decided to construct an earth dam over the rock crib dam. Then after World War II, the dam was raised again, creating a 40-acre reservoir, known as Barnes Lake. The final height of the dam was approximately 42 feet above the rock foundation.

The modifications provided power for the Toccoa Falls Institute (which later became Toccoa Falls College) until 1957. Afterward, the development of power was stopped, but the lake continued to be used for recreational purposes.

Damage from Kelly Barnes Dam flood. Image credit: Vernon B. Sauer, Public Domain, Wikipedia Commons

On November 6, 1977 at 1:30 a.m., the Kelly Barnes Dam failed after a period of heavy rain. About seven inches of rain had fallen from November 2-5. A total of 200 feet of the dam had failed, resulting in a peak of 24,000 cubic feet per second maximum discharge to burst downstream.

The flood resulted in 39 fatalities, in addition to damages estimated at $2.8 million by the Federal Disaster Assistance Administration and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

A view of the former reservoir area after the dam breach. Image credit: Vernon B. Sauer, Public Domain, Wikipedia Commons

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the Federal Investigative Board could not determine a sole cause of the failure. However, it did conclude a combination of factors caused the failure. The most probable causes were “a local slide on the steep downstream slope probably associated with piping, an attendant localized breach in the crest followed by progressive erosion, saturation of the downstream embankment, and subsequently a total collapse of the structure.”


Filed Under: Infrastructure

 

Related Articles Read More >

Do Sensors Make Infrastructure Safer?
Crawling Robots and Flying Drones May Help Missouri’s Bridges
Viasat and Facebook Collaborate to Expand Internet Connectivity in Rural Mexico
Smartphone-Based System to Monitor America’s Crumbling Infrastructure

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Renishaw next-generation FORTiS™ enclosed linear encoders offer enhanced metrology and reliability for machine tools
  • WAGO’s smartDESIGNER Online Provides Seamless Progression for Projects
  • Epoxy Certified for UL 1203 Standard
  • The Importance of Industrial Cable Resistance to Chemicals and Oils
  • Optimize, streamline and increase production capacity with pallet-handling conveyor systems
  • Global supply needs drive increased manufacturing footprint development

Design World Podcasts

June 12, 2022
How to avoid over engineering a part
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings