Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings

Antitrust Trial for AT&T and Time Warner Deal Set for March

By Bevin Fletcher | December 7, 2017

Share

AT&T and Time Warner will head to court on March 19 to fight against the Justice Department’s attempt to block the companies’ proposed $85 billion merger.

The antitrust trial date was set by a judge in Washington at a Thursday pre-trial hearing, Reuters reported.

The March date is after AT&T’s requested start date of Feb. 20, but before the DOJ’s desired date of May 7. 

It also falls before the April 22 deadline in the companies’ merger agreement, but Judge Richard Leon indicated a decision isn’t likely to be ready by then, according to Reuters.  

“April 22 is not realistic,” he said, pointing instead to a late April or May ruling.

AT&T and Time Warner first announced the deal back in October 2016, and managed to secure regulatory approval from the Chilean, Mexican, and Brazilian governments, but were hit with an antitrust lawsuit from the DOJ in late November.

The Justice Department claimed the deal could harm American consumers and hinder competition. It also said the merger could allow AT&T to use its control over Time Warner’s popular networks, like HBO, CNN, and TBS, to force rivals to pay hundreds of millions of dollars more per year for distribution rights.

AT&T, which is the No. 2 U.S. wireless operator and also owns DirecTV, called the lawsuit “a radical and inexplicable departure from decades of antitrust precedent.”

After reports began circulating that the DOJ might take action to block the deal, Wells Fargo Senior Analyst Jennifer Fritzche noted that nothing about the law or precedent for the DOJ to approve vertical mergers had changed, and the department would still “face the same uphill battle in court if it sued to stop it.”

In court filings AT&T has asserted the transaction is “pro-competitive” and “pro-consumer,” saying it’s a “classic vertical deal” and would not eliminate any competitors from the marketplace.

The telecom giant also said in a court filing that Time Warner’s Turner unit had already offered distributors agreements that forbid Turner programming from going dark during any potential arbitration over licensing terms for seven years after the deal closes.


Filed Under: Industry regulations

 

Related Articles Read More >

ids-industrial-camera-manufacturer.sustainability-3
IDS focuses on sustainability in shipping
Part 5: Motion control + MQTT, OPC-UA, and other protocols for cloud services
Facebook CEO Zuckerberg Calls for More Outside Regulation
Musk’s Boring Company Calls it Quits on LA Tunnel, Instead Focuses on Hyperloop

DESIGN GUIDE LIBRARY

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Global supply needs drive increased manufacturing footprint development
  • How to Increase Rotational Capacity for a Retaining Ring
  • Cordis high resolution electronic proportional pressure controls
  • WAGO’s custom designed interface wiring system making industrial applications easier
  • 10 Reasons to Specify Valve Manifolds
  • Case study: How a 3D-printed tool saved thousands of hours and dollars

Design World Podcasts

May 17, 2022
Another view on additive and the aerospace industry
See More >
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
    • Fluid power
  • Learn
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
    • Engineering Week
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • MC² Motion Control Classrooms
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
  • LEAP AWARDS
  • Leadership
    • 2022 Voting
    • 2021 Winners
  • Design Guide Library
  • Resources
    • 3D Cad Models
      • PARTsolutions
      • TraceParts
    • Digital Issues
      • Design World
      • EE World
    • Women in Engineering
  • Supplier Listings