Design World

  • Home
  • Articles
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
  • 3D CAD Models
    • PARTsolutions
    • TraceParts
  • Leadership
    • 2020 Winners
    • 2019 Winners
    • LEAP Awards
  • Resources
    • Subscribe
    • DIGITAL ISSUES
      • EE World Digital Issues
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • LEAP Awards
    • MC² Motion Control Classroom
    • Motion Design Guide Library
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
  • Women in Engineering
  • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • Videos
  • COVID-19

The 5G bogey man

By Lee Teschler | October 10, 2019

Share

Leland Teschler • Executive Editor
[email protected]
On Twitter @ DW_LeeTeschler

Since at least the late 1970s, there have been claims that radio frequency waves are hazardous to human health. Some of the first concerns arose because of RF levels produced by a Pave Paws (Precision Acquisition of Vehicle Entry Phased Array Warning System) installation in Cape Cod. The units operated at between 420 and 450 MHz with a pulse repetition rate of 18.5 Hz. Concerns arose because of a study funded by the FDA. The researchers had exposed cats to low-intensity fields at 450 MHz which were modulated at 16 Hz. The exposure altered the outflow of calcium ions from the cats’ brain tissue. (Things went back to normal once the fields were removed.)

Thus low-intensity RF fields modulated at roughly the same frequency as Pave Paws could change the LTeschlerTHphysiology of animals. Since then, several studies have looked at health concerns specific to Pave Paws. The conclusions have been that it doesn’t harm humans who stay far enough away to keep field intensity below permissible exposure limits.

Nevertheless, the FDA study made people wonder about human exposure to other kinds of RF. There has been a vocal minority who claim even low-intensity RF causes various medical issues in humans. In recent times, the focus of their concern has shifted from radar and TV towers to cell phones.

It’s possible to find studies of cell phone fields that report adverse effects in animals. One in particular was conducted by the National Toxicology Program of the National Institutes of Health and Public Health Service. Researchers there blasted rats with GSM or CDMA-modulated 900 MHz signals for over 18 hours daily and over periods ranging from weeks to a couple of years. Researchers did indeed note conditions that included weight loss and the development of tumors. The thing to note, however, is that the tests subjected those poor rats to specific absorption rates (SAR) of as high as 9 W/kg, far exceeding the SAR specified for cell phones (1.4 W/kg).

Unfortunately, a cottage industry has sprung up ready to sell fearful people gadgets said to ward off “harmful” electromagnetic fields arising from devices such as cell phones. The purveyors of this stuff will often cite the results of studies like that of the National Toxicology Program while obfuscating the fact that these tests took place in conditions that in no way resemble the real world.

And that brings us to 5G networks now on the drawing boards. These will use much higher frequencies than those of today’s cell phones, up to 60 GHz. 5G millimeter waves don’t penetrate the body as deeply as cell phone frequencies. Where cell phone frequencies have been shown to penetrate three to four inches into the human body, millimeter waves are likely to penetrate no deeper than the skin.

I suspect this fact won’t stop the RF scaremongers. But here’s an additional point to consider: Cell phone use has mushroomed. One might expect to see a rise in the rate of brain tumors if cell phones put out enough RF to cause them. Relax. According to the American Cancer Society 2018 Central Brain Tumor Registry of the U.S., and more recently a study in Australia, the rate of brain tumor occurrences has been flat since the 1990s.

You might call that an inconvenient fact if you are in the RF scare mongering business.

You may also like:


  • Poor numerical skills after four years of college
  • tariff tango
    Tariff tango? A reminder why domestic manufacturing matters

  • Goal setting zaniness in corporate culture

  • Get ready for engineers who earn their degrees online

MOTION DESIGN GUIDES

“motion

“motion

“motion

“motion

“motion

“motion

Enews Sign Up

Motion Control Classroom

Design World Digital Edition

cover

Browse the most current issue of Design World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading design engineering magazine today.

EDABoard the Forum for Electronics

Top global problem solving EE forum covering Microcontrollers, DSP, Networking, Analog and Digital Design, RF, Power Electronics, PCB Routing and much more

EDABoard: Forum for electronics

Sponsored Content

  • Drilling rig OEM benefits from a PLC with edge computing technology: IIoT case study
  • The industry shift to smart electromechanical actuators
  • Commemorating a great entrepreneurial personality – Oskar Lapp at 100 – A pioneer for the future
  • SE motor – uncompromised motion performance
  • With virtual commissioning, commissioning time and prototype waste is reduced
  • Master Bond Supreme 10HT High strength, NASA low outgassing approved epoxy
Engineering Exchange

The Engineering Exchange is a global educational networking community for engineers.

Connect, share, and learn today »

Tweets by @DesignWorld
Design World
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Manage your Design World Subscription
  • Subscribe
  • Design World Digital Network
  • Engineering White Papers
  • LEAP AWARDS

Copyright © 2021 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Design World

  • Home
  • Articles
    • 3D CAD
    • Electronics • electrical
    • Fastening & Joining
    • Factory automation
    • Linear Motion
    • Motion Control
    • Test & Measurement
    • Sensors
  • 3D CAD Models
    • PARTsolutions
    • TraceParts
  • Leadership
    • 2020 Winners
    • 2019 Winners
    • LEAP Awards
  • Resources
    • Subscribe
    • DIGITAL ISSUES
      • EE World Digital Issues
    • Future of Design Engineering
    • LEAP Awards
    • MC² Motion Control Classroom
    • Motion Design Guide Library
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
  • Women in Engineering
  • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • Videos
  • COVID-19